Thomas Sowell wrote on May 28, 2013 at Real Politics:
We
have truly entered the world of "Alice in Wonderland" when the CEO of a
company that pays $16 million a day in taxes is hauled up before a
Congressional subcommittee to be denounced on nationwide television for
not paying more.
Apple
CEO Tim Cook was denounced for contributing to "a worrisome federal
deficit," according to Senator Carl Levin -- one of the big-spending
liberals in Congress who has had a lot more to do with creating that
deficit than any private citizen has.
Because
of "gimmicks" used by businesses to reduce their taxes, Senator Levin
said, "children across the country won't get early education from Head
Start. Needy seniors will go without meals. Fighter jets sit idle on
tarmacs because our military lacks the funding to keep pilots trained."
The
federal government already has ample powers to punish people who have
broken the tax laws. It does not need additional powers to bully people
who haven't.
What
is a tax "loophole"? It is a provision in the law that allows an
individual or an organization to pay less taxes than they would be
required to pay otherwise. Since Congress puts these provisions in the
law, it is a little much when members of Congress denounce people who
use those provisions to reduce their taxes.
If
such provisions are bad, then members of Congress should blame
themselves and repeal the provisions. Yet words like "gimmicks" and
"loopholes" suggest that people are doing something wrong when they
don't pay any more taxes than the law requires.
Are
people who are buying a home, who deduct the interest they pay on their
mortgages when filing their tax returns, using a "gimmick" or a
"loophole"? Or are only other people's deductions to be depicted as
somehow wrong, while our own are OK?
Supreme
Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes pointed out long ago that "the very
meaning of a line in the law is that you intentionally may go as close
to it as you can if you do not pass it."
If
the line in tax laws was drawn in the wrong place, Congress can always
draw it somewhere else. But, if you buy the argument used by people like
Senator Levin, then a state trooper can pull you over on a highway for
driving 64 miles per hour in a 65 mile per hour zone, because you are
driving too close to the line.
The
real danger to us all is when government not only exercises the powers
that we have voted to give it, but exercises additional powers that we
have never voted to give it. That is when "public servants" become
public masters. That is when government itself has stepped over the
line.
Government's
power to bully people who have broken no law is dangerous to all of us.
When Attorney General Eric Holder's Justice Department started keeping
track of phone calls going to Fox News Channel reporter James Rosen (and
his parents) that was firing a shot across the bow of Fox News -- and
of any other reporters or networks that dared to criticize the Obama
administration.
When
the Internal Revenue Service started demanding to know who was donating
to conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status,
what purpose could that have other than to intimidate people who might
otherwise donate to organizations that oppose this administration's
political agenda?
The
government's power to bully has been used to extract billions of
dollars from banks, based on threats to file lawsuits that would
automatically cause regulatory agencies to suspend banks' rights to make
various ordinary business decisions, until such indefinite time as
those lawsuits end. Shakedown artists inside and outside of government
have played this lucrative game.
Someone
once said, "any government that is powerful enough to protect citizens
against predators is also powerful enough to become a predator itself."
And dictatorial in the process.
No
American government can take away all our freedoms at one time. But a
slow and steady erosion of freedom can accomplish the same thing on the
installment plan. We have already gone too far down that road. F.A.
Hayek called it "the road to serfdom."
No comments:
Post a Comment